Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Or Apple Pay can just be like Google Wallet is on Android? The alternative is not multiple apps.
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
'sph' doesn't seem too bad though.
Comment · 1 year ago
The functionality we're discussing can be used for tools that are not build dependencies. They may be important for your project and worth having contributors be on the same version but not part of the build.

It will still add the dependencies of those tools as indirect dependencies to your go.mod file, that is what's being discussed.

Comment · 1 year ago
What if I'm already using techniques, such as sandboxing, to prevent the tools from doing anything unexpected? Why bring this entire mess of indirect dependencies into my project if I'm just using a tool to occasionally analyze my binary's output size? Or a tool to lint my protobuf files?
Comment · 1 year ago
Reachability analysis on a tool that could be called by something outside of the project? We're talking about tools here after all - anything that can run `go tool` in that directory can call it. The go.mod tool entry could just be being used for versioning.
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for working on it. It is a nice feature and still better than alternatives.

I'm not a library author and I try to be careful about what dependencies I introduce to my projects (including indirect dependencies). On one project, switching to `go tool` makes my go.mod go from 93 lines to 247 (excluding the tools themselves) - this makes it infeasible to manually review.

If I'm only using a single feature of a multi-purpose tool for example, does it matter to me that some unrelated dependency of theirs has a security issue?

Comment · 1 year ago
I have tested it and probably will use it but the fact that it pollutes your go.mod's indirect dependency list (without any distinction indicating it's for a tool) is very annoying.
Comment · 3 years ago
That seems infinitely better than the status quo. Having unnecessary procedures is much worse. With the former you can go to another doctor, with the latter they'll just run up your bill until you're broke or dead unless you're one of the exceedingly rare few who gets medical advice from multiple doctors (most can't afford that or do not have alternative in-network doctors).
Comment · 3 years ago
Hacker News, where hackers beg a trillion dollar company to keep not allowing them to create apps on their own hardware without having to go through a bureaucratic process of uploading it to a store. You know, as hackers do.
Comment · 3 years ago
I agree and I think the damage to humanity that the anti-nuclear movement has done is incalculable. So many years of progress have been missed out on... and while some of it was due to greed (fossil fuel industry funding), most of it was just misplaced fear, whether propaganda induced or from an inability to see the full picture.

The anti-nuclear movement is also still alive and doing well but at this point it's like arguing over spilled milk, the damage is mostly done and a lot of is irreversible. We can try to salvage nuclear but we've already regressed to further impure sources in some countries so progress seems unlikely.

Comment · 3 years ago
I wish more people knew about fraud protection and how not to trigger it. If you want to pay in an unusual way, ask support if it's allowed or causes issues.

If you just try and imitate the average customer you will almost always be on the happy path, but ordering multiple books with multiple cards in a short period... I think that would trigger any decent fraud protection and not just at Amazon scale.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton