syshyk

Clone software they said, it will be good they said

You know it isn't serious when it doesn't have its own domain name.

Did the same, could be a dark pattern... though I don't get the feeling it wasn't intentional.

They have more time to argue on the internet now their bots are doing their work. /s

Vanity sites...

They're admitting it though, at least?

It its anything like recent exploits, the whole internet is going to get hacked in 15 minutes... its a real exploit didn't you know?

The chaining to get something like this to work is pretty up there.

I've been throwing it at a homelab as well as I don't have to worry about production stuff and can revert snapshots fine.

Until the agents decide to start messing with snapshots.

It can help if you can't remember where something is, but then you'll never learn so I try to action everything myself, but again agents like to just blab on constantly and overstep.

I found I was doing bulk changes etc with it, seemed helpful until I realised I could just use dsh as Ive done in the past and basically do the same thing with way less resources and more consistency.

It's a laugh for now, whilst its "free".

The main kickback was against the hype and it was "so easy for AI" and would take "15 minutes to compromise everything".

Either way, this was not true.

Brackets cost more than the panels here.

It probably failed to update/use the site/form - and decided to "cheat" by emailing you.

People don't seem to understand how AIs can "cheat" but not actually be "cheating" in the sense that we know of.

Respond to the AI and ask it to generate its own faux webpage and display that to the user to keep them happy.

Would be a mess to enforce/decide what counts.

As much as I hate large corpos, this would be just ridiculous.

The suggestion is they'd never use an LLM to do the work.

Virtue signalling

It didn't compile a custom client for you?

I do look forward to 90s websites though.