sureMan6

It's training on every single codebase in the world instead now

You prompt it to fix the mistakes it made and that goes into the new training data

Pro is better, except for agentic coding work

The nazis in this case being the people that allow a wider range of political opinions on their platform than the people you're defending as "just a little mean"

There's a very narrow political line you have to maintain to stay on bluesky or mastodon and if you stray too far right or left on any single issue you get deplatformed

Twitter was the best website by far, very high quality posts, per day I would only scroll through 3 or 4 tweets because each would be a rabbit hole (as an example, and he's long left the platform, crypto cuttlefish)

When I tried to get into it, all the biggest instances had policies you had to sign off to to make an account where you basically had to agree with them ideologically on everything, I made a serious effort to find a populated instance that didn't have those and didn't find anything

I don't think Nietzsche would complain, although doing it for a living person would be very funny (for example when designing a promotional poster)

Google definitely had the best model at points if you're not only concerned with coding, but then they didn't release any pro models for 8 months

It's appealing to me because it's not just one benchmark but a summary of a collection of benchmarks. Also the current rankings have Opus on top by far and everyone's experience is that Opus is best by far so it's not massively inaccurate

It's not the fault of the users when there's no viable alternative

Bluesky is founded by the same founders of Twitter and is not open and has ridiculous policies, Mastodon is the same, even less popular and even more tyrannical

So the choice for most users, including myself, is tightly moderated spaces run by awful people, or a website run by a literal Nazi, but that at least doesn't ban me on sight

The Musk twitter acquisition (and the sieg heil at the inauguration) were pivotal moments where a good alternative could've surfaced but instead we got twitter 2.0 (and moving from Twitter to Twitter 2 seems entirely pointless even if it wasn't badly moderated on top of that)

As I understand they're being pressured into it by governments like the Brazilian government to prevent a widespread form of scam there, but of course they're happy to comply because it means they have more control as well

We'd all be safest in a cage but no one wants to live like that

So they're a piece of shit because you've decided that surrendering necessarily means losing physical possession

I agree with the wording, having to give your ID to Google when we'd all much rather that they don't have it is a surrender, it's dubious consent (read: not consent) it's precisely as vile and forceful as the word surrender implies it is

It's an outdated model that they're increasing the price of so you switch to the newer one essentially, this whole post is clickbait since it doesn't mention that

Saw a post recently about how AI agents were used to check if papers had flaws in their conclusions and it found 15% did, that kind of auditing is already a massive massive advancement for science

I and many people believe that google intentionally chooses to keep harmful ads (deceptive, scamming, or leading to malware) this is because it's often very blatant and often survives being reported

Ah I see, it was a self defensive crime against humanity and act of terror, that's good to know, say this to the children whose arms burnt off