sungho_

Just out of curiosity. What makes startups different? Is the lack of structure the key difference?

> This is still true - a compiler can never win this battle. All a human programmer has to do is take the output of the compiler and make a single optimisation, and he/she wins. This is the advantage that the human has - they can use any of a wide variety of tools at their disposal (including the compiler), whilst the compiler can only do what it was programmed. The best the compiler can hope for is a tie.

This is awkward

I really love this project and want to keep rooting for its success. But the presentation is currently very confusing. The biggest issue is that I can’t tell what is fictional 'lore' and what is an actual feature of it. I don’t think you have to sacrifice the concept to make things clearer; it’s definitely possible to maintain a strong concept while ensuring visitors aren't lost. Anyway, I hope this goes well!

How about adding these texts and reactions to LLM's context and iterating to improve performance? Keep doing it until a real person says, 'Yes, you're good enough now, please stop...' That should work.

It's fun

Honestly, it must have been annoying yet fun. If I'd gotten something like that, it would have amused me all day.

"....what you think counts. Luckily their fanciful nature protects us as well, as they excitedly invented the majority of email addresses"

It went well, right?

If a reader gets angry simply because the author used ChatGPT instead of Claude, then the reader is an idiot.

They say no childbirth means no children. But must children be such an inconvenience? Even if Korea ceases to produce human infants, AI children may be born in their stead. Or, through reverse-aging, the elderly could become the new children.

Orion's arm

The links you provided need a control group to be considered proof. The key is how it compares to when counseling was provided by just a friend, not an expert.

What surprised me most was how large a single neuron is.

You are confusing ‘thinking it is possible’ with 'being certain of it.'

Contrary to what one might think, if you were to live forever, you might end up taking insane risks and trying anything and everything.

It's completely different to say that the government took the lead in an industry that didn't exist before and to say that it provided support to an already successful industry. Of course, what I said was wrong refers to the former. In fact, the government supports all industries to some extent, so that can't be a label.