sultezdukes
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
That said, I can never see Clojure "winning" as in how Java "won". For all of Clojure's strengths, it's at best an intermediate step up from Ruby, Python, Perl... It's not that next order of magnitude leap of productivity that is necessary to "win".
The research just isn't going in that direction. The research is going into type systems and static guarantees. And I think the real productivity boosters of the future will be in very smart tooling - a conversation with your IDE I would say. Maybe Clojure could have different views (different surface syntaxes). Maybe it could be the basis of something like intentional programming. But straight Clojure with Emacs isn't going to be "winning" in the big way.
Do you really believe that or just being flippant?
What exactly was your problem, completely dead panel or massive backlight bleeding?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-QNIX-QX2710-LED-Evolution-27-256...
Wow, you really believe that is the best way? Or is that the best way in the demented minds of the N. Korean leadership?
They might say that to their population, like they say that Kim Jung "Be Illing" shot a hole in one every time, but they don't really want the entire Korea, because they know they can never have the entire Korea.
But as you and the parent pointed out, I've also seen huge improvements in build times with VS2012.
And with VS2013 we finally get edit-n-continue on x64.
Regular text editors just feel so clunky next to the cohesiveness of VS/Resharper or Intellij.
At some point in time, Emacs is going to have get overhauled to join the 90s, much less the 21st century.
And I understand that CL is a special case with Emacs, but it's still clunky as hell compared to what could have been really awesome environments (think Smalltalk environments), but with lots of resources pumped into the development.
It's weird that your offended by that.
Your first statement I tend to agree with, though 'tyranny' is a strong word often implying rule by a single person.
No, it doesn't imply rule by a single person.
That's the thing about the Clojure community. It doesn't have wackjob fantatics like you.