suddenlybananas

:(

You seem completely joyless.

Well, if the point is to have something that works well and follows the standard, he shouldn't have done anything at all and just use what was already made.

and if he was living in the other states?

Shhh you can't say anything anti-hype here.

You can't generalize and say that 1 is better than 2, it depends entirely on what you are developing, for whom and for what purpose. For a one-off dumb thing for a few people 1 is fine, for anything at scale, 2 is likely better.

Just because something is completely pointless and uninteresting doesn't mean it's not knowledge. It's more or less just justified true belief (with some caveats)

What on earth is that argument?

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

I'd be curious to know what makes some games easier than others to decompile for models? Besides just how complicated the game is.

Persian doesn't have gender and Iran is famously not patriarchal at all.

>"How often are people paying at least $600 annually for something AI can help them do instead"

Not that often.

If we end up having a centrally planned economy but controlled by billionaires instead of the proletariat, it would be quite upsetting.

If you ate up that 12T dollars on AI, the economy would collapse and whoosh would go the 12T dollars.