storrgie

Joined 13 years ago

Karma
131
Submissions
87
Member since
Feb 25
https://andrew.dunn.dev
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Potentially they are doing some hairpin rules that require specific enumeration?
Comment · 2 years ago
I think for _most_ people it comes down to this: how much can I cram into the platform. More lanes is more high speed storage, special purpose processing, and networking interfaces.
Comment · 2 years ago
Not to snipe but there does seem to be (as of this year) some folks doing cargo (e.g. longtail) with Bosch for USD ~4K.

The entire sector needs disruptive pricing on reliable sub-components. What it's been getting is disruptive pricing with unreliable products that fail silently/annoyingly (e.g. firmware) or catastrophically (e.g. fire).

Comment · 2 years ago
I think adding Pinion, doubt they are dropping Bosch. Pinion has potentially a superior platform in that you have a fully integrated motor and gearbox, but this is a new item in the market. Bosch with Rholoff[0] is extremely well known as a platform, has high reliability and excellent efficiency across a wide shift range.

As a Bosch+Rholoff owner and a Pinion C.12 owner... I'd _loved_ it if R&M were doing Pinion in their cargo line. If something happens to your rear wheel you have to rebuild around your Rholoff. This might be hard to do on a tour compared to buying a new wheel if you had a Pinion. This assumes that your motor and electronics are not at risk of failing, which may be only reasonable if you're using Bosch...

I'm happy to see Pinion being picked up by R&M. I'd assume this is an excellent sign for Pinion as R&M's _schtick_ seems to be the customer experience (e.g. performance and reliability). This obviously signals that they are in some reasonable partnership to support this configuration for a long time. It would have been really nice to see Pinion offered in at-least one of their cargo platform though.

We just got a Load4 and I noticed that the Bosch+Rholoff dual battery configuration lagged in availability pretty significantly behind the other configurations. I presume this probably made R&M product management a bit irritated as the products form Bosch seem to be announced about a year before things are available. Anecdotally I believe I received 725wh batteries on my order when there is open discussion about how these batteries are not even in production by Bosch anymore as they've moved on to a higher density. Seems like with Bosch there is a big lag between announcement of a market disrupting product and when integrators get it on platform. Pinion may be faster?

Above there is a comment about Bosch being a ripoff (e.g. high margins), certainly it is but they are likely the only company you can build a product off unless you're going into race to the bottom price range. Propel has an interesting post [1] about going Bosch only. Now there are major providers in Germany also providing solutions: Pinion, ZF. I believe propel also started a thing called bloom [2][3] where I bet the "after sales support" portion of starting an e-Bike business is often times a discussion of why Bosch is safe.

[0]: https://www.rohloff.de/en/products/speedhub

[1]: https://propelbikes.com/bosch-only/

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlexoIDBN9E

[3]: https://togetherwebloom.us/

Comment · 3 years ago
Do you have a writeup on this configuration?
Comment · 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this. These new systems that can expose a PCIe slot are extremely impressive.
Comment · 4 years ago
An advantage here would be people self hosting their own based on this project.
Comment · 5 years ago
Podman also switched to notify based units in 3.3.3
Comment · 5 years ago
The consistent transparency has guided many of my acquisition decisions personally and professionally. It also drove me to seriously examine B2, which is used personally and professionally as well.

Would like to encourage your organization to keep publishing these works, and the works like your POD. It’s really spurned on a lot of innovation and sharing.

Comment · 5 years ago
Per comitter would be ideal, viewing source and interacting via tickets is something that is usually a secondary stakeholder community that is larger than the score development group (in every org I see adoptjng forge style tools)
Comment · 5 years ago
Toolbox on silverblue is something to look at if you're interested in this style of application deployment.
Comment · 5 years ago
I'd say that it's worth 30$/year for "family" as well rather than individual. For example, I'd happily pay that fee for my family but I feel like I'd have a hard time telling my family to each pay that fee when "they have it from google already".
Comment · 6 years ago
not the _identity_ servers currently though.
Comment · 6 years ago
can you comment on the vision that gitlab as a product would have in the future for integration with gitter/matrix?

We're running a decent sized gitlab+mattermost instance now, we're using mattermost guests to pull in collaborators from upstream. It would be overall a lot easier if we were using something like matrix where it's federated and we can bring people in to our homeserver without having to make accounts for them.

Comment · 6 years ago
fedora+rpmfusion+flathub

silverblue effectively gives you the ability to have the benefits of a rolling distro and the benefits of a distro that does releases (stability focused).

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton