steve-benjamins
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
I’m suggesting a more productive argument would criticize the substance of my article — not my incentives.
I don’t want an email marking tool that:
• Charged overage fees • Uses dark patterns to charge me more
Does the content of my article seem dishonest?
I agree affiliate content should be read skeptically but you also have to be realistic: why would anyone go to all this work if not for some financial incentive?
And it’s not as simple as cross-checking their public affiliate offers because these types of companies are always offering higher, private payouts (in exchange for editorial control).
That’s not even true! Loops is in “the best” and if doesnt have an affiliate link.
All “the rest” have affiliate programs too… I was just lazy to sign up for them.
Not everything is a conspiracy. The reality in this case is more mundane.
That’s not even true! Loops is in “the best” and if doesnt have an affiliate link.
All “the rest” have affiliate programs too… I was just lazy to sign up for them.
Not everything is a conspiracy. The reality in this case is more mundane.