stellalo

I’m wondering: could one achieve the same level of ergonomicity (lack of lifetimes, Rc, …) by imposing a similar “discipline” with thinking ahead about data storage, and staying within a subset of Rust?

Edit: I guess one would still miss Goose’s memory layout, which is (if I understand correctly) where it wins in performance.

> This is a pretty grim prognosis for European AI.

Is this better or worse than no news from European AI?

I don’t think you can tell someone why they are sad, better than they can, can you?

Was thinking the same

Does anybody have info about the battery life? Doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere.

> Full auto-calendar (to year 2099)

This they will need to update pretty soon

harness + llm = agent

But the thesis of the OP is that it is !easier && different

You’ll fail the mandatory inspection

Oral exams, what an experience

This is really beautiful and tragic at the same time. Very well written.

I speculate the real goal is to have that fixed over time, and then use it as precious training data for Rust capabilities

Is this some sort of “incompleteness” paradox for AI alignment? Seriously

It doesn’t look like OP or the specific paragraph is describing an LLM problem, but rather a people problem