Recent submissions

Comment · 3 years ago
Thanks for pointing this out! I'll have this updated. We're remote within US timezones.
Comment · 3 years ago
feel free to have them reach out for feedback about why we passed on them, I offer that to anyone who asks. we have taken screens with new grads and folks with less than 2 years of professional experience from this job posting already so I assure you that line is accurate.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
I think this is a really good idea. Just imagine being able to open source rulesets and cards and being able to load them into your deck on a moments notice, and your friends being able to do the same. I hope that you make this work, I would easily pay 200$ for a deck if there were a few games to choose from and a platform to build my own rulesets and cards and load them into the physical cards.
Comment · 4 years ago
The selective pressures of your model reward dishonesty (under promise over deliver / make estimates as high as possible to mitigate downside and reduce pressure). Why is that making your team better?
Comment · 4 years ago
I try to cut it early to stop wasting time, especially if its a small company and you will likely be working with that person. I had to do this twice out of 5 companies I interviewed at from YC a couple years back.
Comment · 5 years ago
Happy to see this, congrats to Mitch!

<Void> lives on

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
It was bad faith of DHH to say that posting the pyramid was meant to compare the list of names to genocide. The good faith interpretation would make it extremely clear that the employee was comparing the list of names to the lowest rung in the pyramid AKA the farthest removed from genocide. That rung is simply called "biased attitudes" and includes a wide span of things, none of them remotely comparable to genocide and several of them could be used to accurately represent the list. Eg. "Fear of differences", "Stereotypes", "Justifying biases by seeking out like minded people"

I don't really understand how or why DHH would construe that as "you're comparing a list of company names to genocide"

Comment · 5 years ago
This is completely constructed in your mind. If you tried this vs any woman rated 100 points higher than you or more, this would be a death sentence. It has nothing to do with gender.

Avoiding the objectively best move just means you're making inaccuracies and blunders, giving the game away for free. Nobody above 1200 rating is going to be "afraid of their position" that is not a thing. Below 1200 rating, there may be people like that due to inexperience, but it would be across both genders IF it existed at all which I'm completely unconvinced of.

Comment · 5 years ago
a couple of nuances make the remaining 3% a bit more difficult to get, two that I noticed is that the bot is bad at holding sustain notes and also tends to make mistakes during long hammer-on sections because it hits two notes at the same time instead of realizing that they are individual notes.

the second one is probably easy to fix by spreading the notes out a bit (hyperspeed mode) but the first one is a bit more annoying to program, probably

Comment · 5 years ago
This will change the world completely. I didn't anticipate seeing anything like this in my lifetime
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
If you ever want a very real anxiety attack drink half of a redline without any caffeine tolerance. If you want to die, drink an entire redline.

I tried it once in college and it blew my mind that something like that was available off the shelf.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton