stackola

But make it 30%+ instead of 10.

I always thought of it as BEE-YOU_ES_DEE

I appreciate the response. I agree with most of what you say.

I still think it's important to point out that in this situation, with a) a lack of primary data and especially b) considering the political and societal implications for publicly disagreeing with the "accepted opinion" consensus might just not be a great measure in this case.

> the overwhelming majority have reached a consensus in favor of vaccination doing more good than harm (for good reason)

Do you believe they have all the data needed to make that a final conclusion? Or are most of those medical professionals simply following certain leaders and descission makers? Would that even count as (useful) consensus then?

I imagine this to be a real-life thing. In Germany, we have things called "Volkshochschule" (think: community college without any commitment, just booked by the course. It would be perfect for this kind of model, or just offering a few weeks crash course during the summer break.

Building and flying custom FPV quadcopters. I think this would be a great way to teach young kids all kinds of interesting topics AND get them to go outside.

Not to stir the pot too much, but the much more prevelant narrative was "Everybody not getting the vaccine would die within a year"

Why does your account read like every comment was written by an AI? They are all so gerneric, most of them seem to directly relate to the title but nothing else. You've also never gone into any discussion after leaving your initial comment.

And yet you make the assertion "What it is not is a successful covert operation by a competent intelligence agency."

"Coicidence theories" (for lack of a better word) are just as difficult to prove on day 1.

... is what the intelligence agency would say.

Or a new German government, but your option seems more likely.

We aren't even talking about arming anyone, we were talking about sabotage.

Just because they are *also* pushing for conflict doesn't mean they are the *only* ones.

This post is specifically about the US' own psyop operations -

> The Pentagon has ordered a sweeping audit of how it conducts clandestine information warfare, after major social media companies identified and took offline fake accounts suspected of being run by the U.S. military — tactics used by countries such as Russia and Iran in violation of the platforms’ rules

Would it be better if he didn't?