Recent submissions

Comment · 9 years ago
At the same time, in order to support Trump, you have to feel that xenophobia, sexual assault, bigotry, and mocking of the disabled are perfectly acceptable in a world leader. So they're not entirely innocent.
Comment · 9 years ago
It's also a heavily moderated forum. Let's see what the response to the article is on Reddit or one of the Chans.
Comment · 9 years ago
Wrong. Most internet forums are privately owned, and thus the concept doesn't apply. Plus, trolling and harassment isn't free speech. Conflating the two is insulting to those who are fighting for actual free speech, in places where they will be arrested for advocating that.
Comment · 9 years ago
"What if most of them aren't "trolls" at all, but rather people who have something to say that is important to them and they choose a method to say it that upsets some people?"

If the only way you can express your dislike of a black actress is to compare her to an ape, maybe just shut the fuck up.

"It is entirely too easy to dismiss a person if all you think they want is to make you mad with what they've said."

And it's entirely too easy to ignore the problem of real trolling and harassment if you think it's just people with "differing opinions".

Comment · 9 years ago
For something like /r/the_donald, you're right. But for something more general, like general Twitter, you're not.
Comment · 9 years ago
Wrong. There's little tolerance for bigotry. There's nothing wrong with that. Having the opinion that a class of people do not deserve the same rights as others is not "diversity" or "having a different opinion". It's bigotry, plain and simple.

What you want is for no one to call you out for espousing terrible views. You want freedom from consequences of speech, not freedom of speech.

Comment · 9 years ago
No. I am rejecting your reply. Go back and look at what happened to Leslie Jones, then try again. This is not simply "Leslie Jones Sucks".
Comment · 9 years ago
I'm sorry, but this "ignore the trolls" meme has been proven wrong time and again these past few years. It's not a solution.
Comment · 9 years ago
That's what they're trying to do.

But I'm getting really, really, really tired of people conflating the "other side" stuff with the trolling stuff. Look at all the stuff sent to Leslie Jones last summer. Do you honestly think that was meant to be a dialog? Of course not. That was trolling. That was harassment. And that is what people are trying to filter out.

Comment · 9 years ago
How are they going to hire you if they don't know you exist?
Comment · 9 years ago
A large part of getting the MBA is the piece of paper saying you have one, and another large part of it is the network you form while getting it. Things you can't really get online.
Comment · 9 years ago
So basically a bunch of classist bullshit.
Comment · 9 years ago
The level of critical thinking missing in order to make a comment like that...

Wasting $100 Million on a 1% chance to disrupt an industry that is not ripe for disruption, and has been famously known for having razor thin margins is not a rational action.

Comment · 9 years ago
Only if they weren't white (See: Oregon Federal Wildlife Refuge office occupation).

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton