st2p

Sharing expenses is compensation and the reg alludes to that fact in part (a) and by virtue of the list of the exceptions to said reg. If you really need a concrete example that includes the "compensation or hire" verbiage look at exception (b) of the reg.

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if:

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

Np. And right. I hated to be pedantic but outright dismissing the fact that there are exceptions to the compensation rule is wrong.

edit: wording

Okay, then what would you call it?

That's not correct. See 14 CFR 61.113 (c) A private pilot may not pay less than the pro rata share of the operating expenses of a flight with passengers, provided the expenses involve only fuel, oil, airport expenditures, or rental fees.

edit: the exceptions of the CFR are (b) through (h) but (c) is the most typical

Thought it was either written by Russ Cox or it had something to do with Roosters. But seriously, it's more of a personal problem if someone can't make the minute mental leap to discriminate between cox and cocks-the name is perfectly fine and doesn't need to be changed.

Just to clarify, Microsoft bought the mobile phones division from Nokia, not Nokia itself.

In 2 or 3 years when you move a few notches up on the developer continuum look back on this comment and reflect.

Please elaborate on why Nimrod "looks awful" to you?

...doing it now.

Misleading title - Microsoft acquired the handset division; Nokia lives on in infrastructure and maps.

It's as simple as, something that's concurrent (simultaneous) may not be parallel (physically) but if it's parallel it's also concurrent. When used as a verb, parallel is interchangeable with concurrent.

Being in the military he has no private life; he's in violation of the UCMJ. Also, because of his rank and position there are security issues. But I'm guessing the real reason for the investigation is that he pissed the wrong person off, or it probably would have been swept under the rug, so to speak.

    import cocoa_keypress_monitor.py
                                 ^

SyntaxError: invalid syntax

No surprises here; retarded comment with retarded code