spott
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
But I also doubt Nvidia is on the hook if OpenAI just no longer wants the compute. I bet they are only on the hook if OpenAI cannot pay for it (is insolvent in some way).
I also have to bring up that OpenAI has already spat out an inference chip that beats Nvidia on flops per watt. So they could potentially not need the compute while other ai companies do.
The reason Nvidia is comfortable making these deals is because if OpenAI can’t use the compute, someone else can.
Granted OpenAI going insolvent likely means a drop in the value of compute…
Claude or OpenAI.
I’m not sure what the value of perplexity is these days.
Anyways, I found it here: https://github.com/Modos-Labs/Glider
It would also wreck Japan.
3.1 percent. Just for context.
If I go to a bank, and I get a loan, then the terms of that loan allow the bank to do that.
If I sell a bond, then I set the terms, and I say that you can’t do that. You buy the bond understanding the terms.
China owns treasury bonds, they don’t have the ability to “bind up the borrower”. They can sell their bonds at market prices, but they can’t say “this debt is worthless, pay us now”. That’s not how bonds work.
That debt is all treasury securities bought on the open market.
They can’t demand the US pays them back early any more than you can.
https://github.com/spott/pi-task-compaction
I’m still playing with it, but it essentially has the model define a region, and mark it with begin_task, and end_task. End_task also requires a fairly hefty summery of the entire region.
It then pulls that entire region and replaces it with the summary. If the model wants it can actually look into the output that was pruned from the conversation, but in practice the summaries have been good enough it hasn’t needed to.
I’ve been using it with 5.6 sol, and even really long sessions have like 6% context used at the end.
Any organization is eventually controlled by people more interested in the organization than its mission. Or something to that effect.
(Accidentally attached this to the wrong post, meant for the post above this)
OpenAI hasn’t had any problems getting impressive amounts of funding. So why ipo?