slybot
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
AFAIK the latest research contradicts to this [1], can you give some links if you have for this?
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192...
GR resulted in Proposal E, Choice 5: Responsible Use of Generative AI. Clearly stating: "Any such automated process should be overseen by a human who remains accountable for its behavior and output."
In the news, it is not detailed but what would be interesting is to profiling automatically, given a somewhat larger pool of participants. Where certain number of pairs during the setup is presented to the new user and asked to make pairwise choices to build the preference profile over.
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992...
If I remember correctly, they had a desk named "JERKER" in early 2000s.
If that is the full quality image given to the model, I think it's not surprising that the model confused with 03/2022.
I don't know if I am the only one, but it feels like trying to rewrite a historical epic with someone's own themes. I don't say one is better or worse, but it just doesn't feel right.
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632224 and https://x.com/kunalb11/status/2071624878713971176
After reading the first sentence, I cannot stop imagining some Rust people cannot stop salivating at the prospect to a version saying, "written in Rust", "safe", etc. ~