slmjkdbtl

I think software render is much easier to port than GPU? Since you only need to implement blitting the image buffer to the screen. Also having direct easy access to the image buffers can help you make effects easier? Please educate me I'm not that well versed in current GPU programming.

> MySpace: in 2019, during a server migration, it lost all the music uploaded during its first 12 years, more than 50 million songs from 14 million artists.

How much of these are archived by third party? If not it's huge loss to humanity...

Great programmers often also have great personal website design, everything is so clear and not one bit of redundance.

I love their stuff, but curious if anyone besides them actually use uxn to make stuff

article contains the best chart in the world

op-1 is the most notorious one, but they do have some well designed not over-priced products

I wouldn't say TE's products are not ergonomic and totally useless

I'm daily user of the old 3-piece suite, should I be worried they will be taken away from me in the near future?

> React looks cleaner. It reads better at first glance. But that readability comes at a cost: you're trading explicit simplicity for abstraction complexity.

Not always, SolidJS code can look the same as React code, but what goes under the hood is very simple and straightforward.

How do they acquire these images?

They did exactly what I've been wanting to do and did a great job, I'm happy for them, they must be having so much fun writing softwares.

> it came from other people convincing newcomers

Yeah I think you're right