slimebot80

Real questions:

- How much did it cost?

- It's great, and you had lots of input, yet the output is still vague and non specific? These 'tools' seem to excel at one-shot stylizations, but being more specific is hard and takes many iterations at which point it's more pleasant to hire a designer and a dev? And maybe even cheaper, I'm guessing, given there is no mention of cost.

Do you live in the Berghain? :)

so I use "opusplan" mode bc Opus is more expensive and supposedly better at thinking, and Sonnet is good and cheap for executing....

Changing models still gives us a usage hit (right?) but that is outweighed by benefits?

Plan mode is more about be rambling on while Opus detangles my thoughts.

I wish this worked for youtube ads.

Used for training is one thing. Exposed to prying eyes is still unstoppable.

"aggressively optimistic timelines is also what makes it feasible to even attempt these things"

yawn, people keep making this excuse on behalf of the South African investor with poor technical expertise.

it helps they took many billions for a Moon effort they completely fumbled but never returned the cash

I might be misunderstanding something.

He uses $70 for remaining credit and says that's a good thing because it rolls over

But spending $70 on an API (he says he still prefers Opus) is far less cost effective than a Max plan on Anthropic.

The article seems to be nudging us to setup OpenRouter but the premise isn't fully true. A bit of diversity is excellent, but the costs are going to (largely) prohibit it in reality?

Yeah. I'm more concerned about the welfare needed to support millions of low-skill people in high living cost areas, in the age of AI. Those people are being sold dead dreams for the benefit of a handful of billionaires.

I assume this is highly staged as a set routine?

No less impressive, but is it likely each robot autonomously learned a routine? Or just got programmed for a very exact act?

I often ask Claude to update Claude.md and skills..... and sometimes I'll just do that in a new window while my main window is busy and I have time.

Wonder if this is close to triggering a warning? I only ever run in the same codebase, so maybe ok?

"Claude can’t read or edit anything you don’t give it explicit access to"

How confident are we that this is a strict measure?

I personally have zero confidence in Claude rulesets and settings as a way to fence it in. I've seen Claude decide desperately for itself what to access once it has context bloat? It can tend to ignore rules?

Unless there is a OS level restriction they are adhering to?

iCloud Photos.app seems to not be able to show some photos

But Photometor.app (owned by Apple) can...

So that's a little annoying... I wish I had more visibility on photos not showing up in Photos.app, and what it is that stops it showing them

Don't see why not, Taiwan's silicon is a global security asset.