skibbityboop
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
If that's the case, then there is a mitigation for all vulnerable versions, but the team that released php2shell said there is absolutely no complete mitigation and every PHP version between 5.4 and these latest updates is absolutely vulnerable. So which is true?
It's great because it's a completely clean save from a shutdown state, so when we need a scratch copy of a database it only takes as long as cloning whatever snapshot we want (depending on how far back we need to to), then starting a scratch jail that runs from those clone filesystems. When finished, just shutdown scratch and delete the clones, it's like it never happened.
Money may not buy happiness buy money buys you all the freedom you could possibly need to do anything that fits your whimsy.
You lose snapshots (but can have your SAN doing snaps, of course) and a few other small things I can't recall right now, but overall it works great. Have had zero troubles.
Hanging in there with cancer? Sure, fight it and deal with the pain. Dementia? No, please end it. The two aren't even close in comparison, cancer feels easy and merciful.
*Coming from the extremely well thought out and documented zfs utilities to btrfs will have you wondering wtf fairly frequently while you learn your way around.
I guess depends on your needs but I do think I need to investigate timeseries more to see if it'd help us.
It has survived perfectly fine so far and is on a _very_ vulnerable PHP version based on the php2shell writeup. Management knows it could supposedly get popped at any time, and we'd have to rollback to a snapshot, spin it back up, and wait for it to get popped again. Rinse/repeat.