sjagauanbdvva

Because you won’t listen to a word anyone says lol.

You had a visual bug right at the top of the repos README. Then insisted you hadn’t noticed it before.

Whats important is not that specific visual bug, it’s what that bug says about the rest of the code.

How can we believe that this code is high quality if we see a glaring issue 5 seconds into opening the github?

We didn’t seek out your repo and start lobbing critiques at it. YOU POSTED IT as an example of high quality generated code. I’m telling you I am unimpressed

You’re cop posting

Or they don’t know CSS.

Amazing how the LLM is godly with things I don’t understand, and falls over completely when it works in my domain… I wonder why that is /s

You’re missing the point.

You claimed high quality and provided a repo.

Did you not expect someone to actually look and critique it?

Whether the visual bugs are a deal breaker or not isn’t the point.

The point is that’s not high quality code, it may work. But it’s not code I would ship at my job and therefore it’s not high enough quality for anyone serious