sirius87

Doesn't a SIM swap attack impact more than just a single user account of a service? They lose access to SMS and calls from their phone. I'd argue they learn that there's a security issue earlier and cause them to take action (contact carrier or authorities).

A friend's Mom's Facebook account was recently hacked. They didn't have 2FA set. Hacker changed her email address in the Meta account. Meta did not notify her via email of the email address change. She did not use fb for a couple of months and had no idea this had happened. Then she began receiving calls from cousins and relatives saying their account was hacked after receiving a link in a message from her.

I would've advised her to use SMS 2FA. A lot of non-technical folks from an older generation don't even bother with email.

tbf, I was spooked by the initial "turn off your adblocker" banner stuff and I signed up for the offered 3-month YT Premium trial because it's linked to my primary Google account.

In the meantime, I set up a throwaway Google and set that YT profile to have the same subscriptions. Will I pay for YT Premium? Unlikely, but they could make me a pricing offer that's tantalizing enough. I've learned more dev stuff from YT that any Udemy-esque learning service out there.

Curious to hear answers to this too. People forget usernames and that alone would lead to drop off. People are also reluctant to give out phone nos. which is anyway a terrible identifier and has the same issues as email.

FWIW it wasn't meant to sound critical of him, his contributions are much loved and his attempt to push to ESM was also in good spirit with his helpful gist on the issues, but ESM was no silver bullet for the wide mix of imported modules in some projects.

I remember spending a weekend simply inlining all his module code directly into a project to sidestep the type module change. Fun.

Curious to see how this one decision plays out for nodejs IF -

- module authors increasingly adopt ESM

- TypeScript experience with Deno is butter smooth

- npm packages work with Deno

- performance characteristics are similar

- DX for beginners just works (compared to thousands of stale articles with `require('pkg')` and `npm install pkg@latest` for nodejs)

Totally agree.

It's doubly frustrating because a standard for authoring modules across browser and server platforms such as ESM is a good thing. But it's a bit arrogant to expect module authors across TS and JS ecosystems to ship overnight. Beginners may just turn to Deno or Bun simply because hundreds of coding tutorials and snippets no longer work.

Or, when you finally get a TS config that works but then you import @aws-sdk/* or prisma seeds and then you really rip your hair out.

The current ESM experience makes it seem like decision-makers in the node.js project were wilfully oblivious to how large the TypeScript community was and how it was being used in node modules and projects. It really does feel like the maintainers focus was on JS and harmony with TypeScript's evolution was low on the priority list.

Meanwhile anyone using an intersection of TypeScript with jest and any of sindresorhus' libraries when he flipped to ESM for his bajillion libraries immediately felt the downside and moved hard away from ESM.

Imagine the mind-boggling hours lost just to get these export/import formats to glue.

I was in the midst of migrating my namecheap domain from Route53 to Cloudflare. Set up all the DNS records while ignoring the /api/ errors shown at the bottom of the Cloudflare dashboard thinking some ad block setting in my browser was messed up.

Then I realised setting the NS in Namecheap to Cloudflare's nameservers was taking an inordinate amount of time to propagate, and that's when I checked X/Twitter. Set it back to Route53.

Do you offer wildcard certs for subdomains (i.e. *.news.ycombinator.com)? I believe I had some trouble with caddy's tls internal directive when trying to do something crazy like this. Maybe you could mention it as your differentiator too.

EDIT: I currently use mkcert with caddy and it works fine for this.

This was my worst fear but I had opted-in to backup Authenticator with Google. Opting in to backup your data with Google is seamless and it also restores stuff like SMS messages.

But I suppose this is one more thing the anti-trust case against Google should probably be looking into. Should Google be allowed this deep integration with their cloud services?

I faced this issue last week. I use the other user profile for Android app development. My phone was lying on the table before me as I watched it abruptly reboot to a familiar black screen that prompted me to Try to restart or Factory reset the phone (losing all data). Obviously, fearing data loss, I chose to gamble with restart, not knowing what the issue was.

Then the phone began bootlooping with the Google logo and a progress bar stuck, going back to black and repeating. The power button + vol down move to get into fastboot was really really hard to get into. It took several attempts and about 15mins of time to finally get to the Factory reset option again. I lost all my data.

As an occasional android app dev who mainly writes apps for personal use, the thought of reporting the bug to Google didn't even cross my mind because (a) it seemed like a random filesystem corruption (b) I'm pretty much used to Google ignoring even high quality bugs reports from Android devs with helpful logs, so an end-user bug report with no logs would be beyond hope.

This may be a case of grass is greener, but Samsung in recent years has been responsive to bug fixes and updates while with Pixel's you basically get what comes through Android updates. Either way, as an Android user, bugs are a way of life.

I have another 3 year old device on Android 11 no longer eligible for updates with a similar 2 user profile setup, and that also randomly reboots to the Try to restart/Factory reset prompt usually after I hit the power button and the lock screen goes wonky. Just that restarting fortunately works in that case without any data loss.

Question is whether Google Fonts CDN/server was storing the IP address or not. Linking to a user is secondary. If a server does not log or store raw IPs in the first place, where's the fault?