Recent submissions

Comment · 6 months ago
Definitely rude, too close to the same name. Warp just recently open sourced their client, a [not community] personal fork should be more considerate.
Comment · 6 months ago
Does it not sound insane to you that you need to expose your biometrics to a corporation just to make anonymous posts on a forum?
Comment · 6 months ago
Cool concept! I play Go, and it's extremely unnerving that all the good shapes you play in Go are essentially the worst shapes you can play in Tiao :D
Comment · 6 months ago
Sure, but that seems out of scope of the original comment.
Comment · 6 months ago
What is the purpose of this mindset? Should we encourage typical corporate coldness instead?
Comment · 6 months ago
Same here, maybe we're grandfathered into a good plan or something.
Comment · 8 months ago
Since when has raising taxes actually solved any major problem? We have enough taxes, the issue is the corrupt politicians swindling it to themselves and their cronies.
Comment · 8 months ago
Power is not the problem, because power exists regardless of who owns it.

We the people actually have a relatively high amount of power in our states and communities. We just don't use it. The real solution is to convince the masses to pay attention, which is harder today than it ever was.

Comment · 9 months ago
LLMs are an amplifier. The great get greater, and the lazier get lazier.
Comment · 10 months ago
Youtube's downvote button has served me quite well for this purpose.
Comment · 11 months ago
Yeah, Mithril got this right over 10 years ago. Still good to see at least one big player finally catching up. React's state model has always been a pain to work with.
Comment · 1 year ago
Same here. I tried codex a few days ago for a very simple task (remove any references of X within this long text string) and it fumbled it pretty hard. Very strange.
Comment · 1 year ago
I misread your "It always backfires" comment as making something illegal always backfires, rather than the desire to make things simple always backfires (note that "always" implies 100%). So now I see all you're saying is "be careful", which is fine.
Comment · 1 year ago
Of course you prefer reductionist, because that fits your interest of doing nothing, rather than seeking a solution to the very real destructive consequences of the genre in question. That's what I mean by intellectually lazy.

Porn is way easier to define than obscenity, so I don't see that being a problem.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton