simonrobb
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
Here's a prototype: https://imgur.com/9yO28CY
If there is a special case where tensile forces are expected, for example a retaining wall, or a mid-rise structure, or earthquake load, the engineer will specify the the masonry is reinforced with steel and then it can resist tension through the unit/mortar interface just fine.
It is a poor structural engineer who tells the architect masonry isn't an option because tension.
Disclosure: I work on the TSDB underlying M3 (M3DB) at Uber. Still worth checking out though!
Disclaimer: I work on the M3DB team.
Look familiar? https://mattermost.com/
OP's inference that Uber's quarterly loss is more than double Uber's quarterly R&D costs in general shouldn't be propped up by a moment in time observation.
I'm the manager of one of Uber's OSS projects, and all that the things you listed here ring true. I just know that in our case at least, OSS prep absolutely pales in comparison to the feature/operational work put in by the team.
To be clear, when I added "really" to that first sentence it was meant to communicate that there is some cost, but in the sense that it's negligible to Uber's losses, as you point out. I was responding to OP's "dubious use of resources" comment. But I can see that wasn't clear.
sajrobb [at] gmail dot com