sickblastoise

I think svelte 5 is an actual innovation, it does not behave or feel like a “framework” to me. It feels like a natural extension of building an front end with raw html, css, js, solving the headaches you eventually hit when you do so.

I date a nurse, I think nursing might give AI an existential crisis.

Jokes aside, nursing is so incredibly innately about human to human care, this is really just more hamfistig something where it doesn’t belong.

Optimist take, the tech is shit and the people like Trump not JD Vance.

Cryptocurrency = Not being used as a currency, doesn’t even meet the criteria for a true medium of exchange.

AI = Can’t actually be used to automate these federal worker’s jobs, it’s snake oil.

Most importantly, JD Vance, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, although quite powerful and influential right now, are NOTHING without Trump. And as michael Bloomberg showed us, money alone doesn’t win elections.

Seriously this is a very well written article and the concerns are real, especially around the degradation of our institutions over the past 50+ years. But if you put JD Vance, Elon, or Peter thiel in front of your average American, the response will be a more derogatory form of “neurodivergent freak”.

In 1-2 years I’m predicting democrats take back the senate and house, 4 years we get a younger more normal democratic president. Hopefully most of the old neo lib democrats die off and we get more smart charged up dems like AOC, Buttigieg, and the fella from Georgia who will actually tell these rich bastards to stuff it.

Svelte is the only framework I have come across that is actually tackling the problem of front end bloat and I love it

Svelte 5 does a great job of raising warnings for this. You try to use an onclick on a div you get warning to make it tab-able and give it an aria role, and a reccomendation that you should probably be using a button.

Chat, are Dutch people autistic?

I am saying that all people, including neurodivergent people, have personal agency in what kind of work they choose to do. If you work a job that is primarily meaningless work, that’s your choice. My original comment was to say that you have a choice to not work dull jobs, and it is imperative as a nd person to not do it as you will lose. If instead you take a little personal responsibility for your life’s direction, and do work that plays to your strengths, work is easy. Probably true for all people, but absolutely essential for thriving as a neurodivergent person.

> hmmmm

neurodivergent people need to DO work they like. Not sure how you misunderstood my comment to that extent

Ive got a pretty intense ADHD. This article is vaguely offputting to me. I think it makes it out to be that neurodivergent people need to be baby’d in some way.

From my perspective, I think neurodivergent people can’t stand doing things without purpose. A lot of jobs are truly meaningless, dull, uninteresting, especially in the office space. People with ADHD and ASD should not be doing these jobs. You need to find your strengths and interests and work towards that. You should never work a job that you deep down think is bullshit as a ND individual, this is the equivalent of a death sentence. Find something you are passionate about and you can do better work then any normie no matter how loud or fluorescent the office is.

This is actually a major issue in the LLM wrapper space. Building things like agents (which I think are insanely overhyped and I am so out on but won’t elaborate on), usually in Python, where you are making requests that might take 1-5 seconds to complete, with dependencies between responses, you basically need to have expert level async knowledge to build anything interesting. For example, say you want two agents talking to eachother and “thinking” independently in the same single threaded Python process. You need to write your code in such a way that one agent thinking (making a multi second call to an llm) does not block the other from thinking, but at the same time when the agents talk to each other they shouldn’t talk over eachother. Now imagine you have n number of these agents in the same program, say behind an async endpoint on a FastAPI server. It gets complicated quick.

I think your prof’s worries came true on a massive scale

Are you developing directly against your production database?

My current setup on a personal project is docker compose with Postgres and pgadmin container.

I would never think of mocking a database in 2024/2025, just spin one up.

Also keep your lynch pin invariants in the database and not in your code.

Correct solution: stop using inheritance.