shurcooL
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
• https://github.com/golang/go/graphs/contributors
• https://github.com/golang/build/graphs/contributors
Brad also once gave a lightning talk about HTTP/2 that had 80+ slides in 5 minutes. He’s very fast.
As an example, here’s a random song that has a nice beat and I enjoy listening to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY-4-O7GetQ. What kind of “strong emotions outside the normal everyday range” can one feel when listening to it?
I agree certain rare songs can instill strong emotional responses, but that isn’t the case when just listening to random music that sounds good for the first time.
> Now let us suppose that the person enjoys listening to music.
>
> Music enables the person to feel very strong emotions that lie outside the range of their normal everyday emotions.
>
> Music lets a person feel these emotions, almost, but not quite, as if those emotions were real.
I’m quite puzzled by these statements. I enjoy listening to some genres of music. But I don’t see at all how music is connected to experiencing emotions. Isn’t music enjoyable because of completely different reasons? They are hard to describe, but I don’t think they’re “emotions”, are they?Could you please provide a link to it? I’m very interested in seeing this command, but ironically it’s not a name that’s easy to google for.
Edit: I was very wrong, searching for “google repo command” displayed https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo as the very first result.
The page is using up 15-20% CPU and GPU when it is the active tab even when not scrolling. That seems unexpected and unfortunate.
(I noticed because by the time I got to 3400 meters, my laptop's fans became audible.)
* less productive
* less time for your ideas
* less ambitious
These points may or may not be true depending over what timeframe you measure.If it’s your own lifetime, sure. If you measure your productivity over the next 300 years as what you plus your transitive offspring accomplish, it’s possible having kids is a huge boost to your aggregated productivity.
I had fun _because_ it was more constrained. But I also like Go.
As an example, I solved level 6 in what I understand to be an unconventional way:
(spoiler alert)
I realized I could “get out” of readCodesFromKeypad function scope by ending it early and then writing the start of another top level function. Once I had access to global scope, I could add an init() function to modify the “crypto/rand.Reader” variable and assign to it an io.Reader that I could control. I was on mobile so I decided to take a shortcut and just overwrite the global passcode variable instead.
(end spoiler)
I may have “cheated”, but it felt creative and in spirit of the game, and it got me to the next level.
(I'm both impressed and scared of how I used up 1% of my generous mobile data plan in about 5 seconds by clicking 1 link.)
For example, see https://talks.golang.org/2012/goforc.slide#43.
https://dmitri.shuralyov.com/about