shockzzz

That makes sense, I think. Though in the spirit of the original authors, it sounds like it's more about collaborating and getting things working bit-by-bit rather than releasing publicly.

In the legal/financial compliance zone, it's probably about "here are the things we need to get done for this aspect of compliance," and then just doing them.

We're saying the same things, yeah?

Does Agile really not work with large enterprises? Or is it more that "fake agile" doesn't work?

Fair article, but definitely suffers from ethnocentrism. I'm pretty sure they'd find very different results in India, China, Egypt, etc.

makes sense!

Excellent writeup. Looking forward to more development on this. Hopefully Kyle has time to do a Jepsen writeup (orrrr you can hire him!)

If only Blue Origin & SpaceX can behave this way too...

Weren't containers supposed to solve the whole "one interface for everything" nonsense? Now we have a standard interface for the standard interface?

Good response, I'll give him that. It succeeds it bringing focus away from the fact that they tried to kill the book before it got published

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Is their test suite just unit tests, or does it include user-acceptance testing?

lol at hn being quoted

That's crazy misleading. This is just a post saying, "hey, this is a way to sync data faster." Awesome! Much kudos.

But stale data isn't "downtime." This is tech marketing at like, MongoDB level.

I have no idea why the phrase "high availability" is in this post.

It'd be a solid playbook if it worked.

It also doesn't take into account the distance between stops. The L train has a short route compared to other lines.