shmageggy

I wondered the same thing, so I clicked their homepage:

> Run agents and everything they build.

Oh, it’s 100% Claude-slop. How shocking they got hacked! /s

Exactly. This year has been a revelation to me. It’s like the blue dress phenomenon: we all look at the same text and some people see perfectly acceptable prose, and others see unreadable slop-drivel.

100%

Couldn’t make it more than a few sentences in before the bile started to build up in the back of my throat and I had to back out. It’s shocking to me that people knowingly post unedited Claude-slop drivel and are seemingly unashamed about it. In 2026, it seems the main role of technical humans should be to act as a barrier between our agents’ output and other humans.

Is there a news aggregator that rejects Claude-speak content like this? I am so sick of stumbling into it seemingly everywhere lately, and I would love for it to simply be filtered out.

Go fuck yourself. How's that for an LLM tell?

LLM text tells, particularly in their other comments. Definitely AI generated.

Just because you chose to have subtle mastering applied doesn’t mean that the commercial records we’re discussing have done the same, particularly for their digital releases, which is why they sound different. If you listen to vinyl versus digital releases of certain albums, it is obvious. Stop spreading misinformation.

Good site, but it has some frustrating limitations that make it vastly less useful, specifically regarding the phenomenon in the article. The search UI doesn’t expose the release code (and many entries don’t even include it), so when it says “vinyl” you have no idea which of the possibly dozens of releases it refers to, some of which can be awful, like the article points out.

I’m willing to help fix this, but the source code is not public, and when I emailed the author I got no response.

Sorry, but you don’t know what you’re talking about. Many releases get mastered separately for digital and for vinyl, and one or both of them often does “change much”. Usually the brickwall limiting (among other things) on the digital master.

Except when that regulation actually has teeth, which is why he opposed California’s SB 1047. I agree with GP that Altman (and all the rest) want regulation insofar as it protects their moat but no further.

I personally solved this by never clicking a short. We don't have to engage with every technology presented to us.

FTA

> The term “manifold” comes from Riemann’s Mannigfaltigkeit, which is German for “variety” or “multiplicity.”

> You'd probably be shocked at just how much wilderness is in the UK.

You're right. I was shocked at just how little there is. If one's definition of large is more than a few square km, there's virtually none, for any sensible definition of wilderness, at least south of the Cairngorns.