shabble
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
"average time to resolution" is also susceptible.
Both of these are pretty common all over the place, including OSS e.g. https://isitmaintained.com/#metrics
I suspect this sort of thing is one of the major motivations for the (as a user/reporter) infuriating rise in automated "this bug hasn't been touched in NN days, autoclosing for staleness" bots on various issue trackers.
"There are two ways we can fix this problem: we could make iOS better?"
"..."
www.youtube.com##ytd-rich-grid-media.ytd-rich-item-renderer:has(a[href='/@MrBeast'])
www.youtube.com##ytd-rich-grid-media.ytd-rich-item-renderer:has(a[href='/@BeastReacts'])
www.youtube.com##ytd-rich-grid-media.ytd-rich-item-renderer:has(a[href='/@BeastPhilanthropy'])If necessary, could treat tables or other complicated compound entries as a single editable item, although given the mysterious passion everyone I've ever worked with seems to have for putting just about everything into a table regardless of need, I'd hope it could be granular to a cell-level, at least.
Trying to collaboratively write complicated documents with a bunch of inter-relations between sections, from different people (in my case, documentation & regulatory paperwork for medical devices) is a massive pain, and I feel like it's too obvious a problem to be confined to my particular niche.
I vaguely recall Word is widely used for preparing huge legal documents, where the content and stakes are probably similar, so maybe there are some solutions, unless they're just "throw interns at it".
- There's no equivalent of "git blame" that I can find to see who/when a particular line/paragraph/section changed.
- I can't see if there's a way to view my changes separate from other edits to the document, or isolate changes by single authors generally.
- "diffing" via the "compare documents" action seems to want to generate a new document with track-changes edits for changes from old/new, but mangles the histories to present all changes as by the invoker of the diff, at that time, which isn't all that useful.
It's definitely better than nothing at all, but a long way short of where I'd hoped we'd be regarding collaborative document authoring at this point.
perl -ne '/^(?=([abc].*){3})(?!.*([abc]).*\2).{8}k.$/&&print' /usr/share/dict/wordsI'm not sure how well that copes with modern security features like cert pinning, but it's closest I can think of.
[1] https://docs.mitmproxy.org/stable/concepts-modes/#transparen...
I just had a quick check and can't obviously see if that has been fixed/worked around in pylsp-mypy, on the off-chance that you might know :)
It can be useful where you've got a mainloop doing some very predictably timed activities, and allows detection of faults which cause your watchdog servicing to occur too frequently.
I think it's quite common in DSP and things like motor control, where you often have hard realtime requirements and things happening too soon is just as bad as too late.
[1] https://www.st.com/resource/en/reference_manual/rm0090-stm32...
www.youtube.com##div.ytd-rich-item-renderer:has(ytd-channel-name a[href="/c/SOME_CHANNEL_HERE"])