selestify

How are they cheap? Does your organization offer unlimited spend, or does your subscription not run into the same limits as mine?

> But we've also spend a lot of effort over the past year and a half to make the codebase and tooling more approachable to LLMs so they know how we like to do things and follow our standards.

Anything more you can say about this? We desperately need to restructure and standardize our codebase right now.

> if a company offered a 20$/mo service that brings subscribers to the endpoint, carried in a luxury litter by robotized carriers, I would feel that my hobby has been devoided of sense.

As someone else who hikes: why? I do not understand. Do you not enjoy the hobby of hiking for the sake of hiking?

The views will be just as beautiful, the air just as fresh, and the feeling of moving my legs just as energizing, regardless of how others may decide to get to the destination themselves. Why would the experience of others have any impact on my own experience of a trail?

> I don't understand why this question comes up so often.

You don't understand because baked into your entire reply is the assumption that a decent standard of living is guaranteed.

Based on current trends around economic inequality, it seems quite likely that the average person may be given very little to subsist on once their main source of leverage (their ability to perform valuable labor) has been removed.

How is this any more of an upwards money funnel than the prohibitively expensive spreads and commissions that hindered lay access to the markets?

So that some team at Google can hit their OKRs for user adoption and get promoted.

Because some people care a lot more about Ukraine than about a side with pretty unsavory combatants and a radicalized population that supports said unsavory combatants?

Any good descriptions of what it feels like to take part in a formal Turing test, and why it is so humbling?

Geez that's even worse. Google has a deterministic conventional programming fix to the problem and still can't be arsed to fix it?

Why would the turnaround time need to be so small?

What a great analogy, can't believe I haven't heard it before

Ok, but my problem is that what it builds is not right. It's never right on the first try, or the second or third tries. There's always a ton of incremental corrective feedback needed.

Do you run into this problem? If not, then I need to figure out how to stop running into it myself.

If so, then how do you give it all the incremental corrective feedback without a conversation?

The behavior, while slightly exaggerated, rings entirely true for me. From the other comments in this thread, it seems I am prompting poorly in a similar way to the options offered.

I am guessing you prompt differently than what is shown in the game?

Is your harness available for install somewhere?

Surely you still have to give feedback to Claude. How do you do that without talking to Claude directly? By using a different model? But wouldn't that AI have no more common sense than Claude?

What legitimate issues are there around making a fucking button blue?