seasonalgrit
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
i guess to respond to your question: most biomedical research today is eminating from universities and university-affiliated entites. page for page, i generally wouldn't expect a .com web site -- the majority of which are probably just attempting to generate advertising revenue -- to be on par in terms of accuracy etc with a .edu site. generally, I've found one of the best ways to improve the signal-to-noise ratio is to filter to a specific set of domains (e.g., ,edu, .gov) when searching online.
Here is a university page with information:
http://www.umm.edu/health/medical/altmed/supplement/vitamin-...
Nah. Look at Samsung: you can make a TV that spies on you, a washing machine that explodes, and a smartphone that spontaneously catches on fire. And then go take a look at how their stock is doing this year.
We've reached the pavlovian phase of western consumer culture: we'll just keep on buying and buying and buying, no matter what.
(rare exception: sometimes you might get asked to sign an NDA prior to being brought in for an onsite interview. even then, I would think very very carefully about signing it.)
My two cents: don't put companies on a pedestal -- we are certainly nothing special to them, after all. don't do anything you're not 100% comfortable about.
"This course material is only available in the iTunes U app on iPhone or iPad."
That's lame. For years, iTunes U materials used to be available in iTunes store, accessible via macOS and Windows. Now Apple wants me to buy an iPad? Hell no.
[edited for concision/focus.]
Come on, that's ridiculous.
E.g., if a loved one is abusing alcohol, it is definitely your place to intervene.
"Inventing a class with its own interface to hold a piece of information is like inventing a new language to write every short story." -- Rich Hickey