sdhfjg

I could have been more clear, the distinction is semantic. I was referring to culling/sterilization to prevent reproduction in the sexually mature. Unborn persons are not adults, even if they will be.

Eugenics has obvious issues when applied to mature individuals or groups, but I'll need convincing that the same moral position is warranted if we're talking about cells.

>Compared to infinity, all dicks are small...

Wisdom for the ages.

>> Use among 15-24 year olds fell throughout the decade,

>This implies that use among other groups than 15-24 year old had not fell throughout the decade.

Within the context of logic, that is not an implication.

Are the people participating in the scientific studies of the drug participating in alternative medicine?

I didn't bring up Hydroxychloroquine. My point was that it wasn't "alternative medicine" for the time it was authorized by the FDA.

>"Alternative medicine" like ivermectine or hydroxychloroquine have no scientific, properly studied basis for being used.

When a medical doctor prescribes a drug for a purpose that is currently being studied scientifically, that is not "alternative medicine". Ivermectin is still being studied. Hydroxychloroquine was emergency authorized by the FDA.

>No one bats an eye taking it today because it saves lives.

It saved lives in 1955. No one bats an eye taking it today because we know it's safe.

Read the article. We're not talking about formal verification.

>It's Sunday morning and I just discovered that I've lost 3To of data and that all data pipelines have stop working because on Friday I ran for no reason

  hdfs dfs -rm /data

This is profound incompetence.

Tesla might be "...doing it...", but that doesn't mean the stock price isn't confusing.