sd8dgf8ds8g8dsg
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
I don't agree this is a feature. An Javascript implementation of a command line tool is a terrible idea performance wise. There is good reasons jq is written in C.
Where a side channel attack studying the decryption speed/power use can reveal information, the encoding of said encrypted data can not as far as I ever heard about. (It will still be encrypted after base64 decoding has taken place).
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
EDIT: I see you updated your original message with different wording, please ignore this rant.
Care to extend upon why you don't feel go is a good fit for other programming?
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"path/filepath"
)
var (
host = "0.0.0.0"
path = "/var/www/public"
port = 8080
)
func main() {
path, err := filepath.Abs(path)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
listenAt := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%v", host, port)
fmt.Println("static-serve-dir serving", path, "over http at", listenAt)
err = http.ListenAndServe(listenAt, http.FileServer(http.Dir(path)))
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
}This idea is so old it's like beating a dead horse by now. Just the idea that we are not capable of these incredible things just goes to show how little you understand or respect human ingenuity.
> Heck, even the Pentagon admits it doesn't know it all about UFO's, c'mon ..
This didn't happen... ?
Rather, a ex-pentagon guy was recruited by an ex-pop singer guy's nonsense organization, with some nonsense claims.
This is called a PR stunt.
I feel this conclusion rather weak.
As an counter example, consider how the decipherment of the mayan written language was performed [1]. Another one is the hieroglyphs.
Re-constructing how mayan words sounded is still on-going [2].
Also, this type of work is not really possible to "crack with computers" as some have suggested (when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail).
https://www.virtuescience.com/etymology-how-words-change-ove...
That is http://www.thevintagenews.com/2017/09/10/the-hoba-meteorite-...