sbzodnsbd
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
The guy who did the spire did add his own touch (like any cathedral that took several centuries to build). But with subtlety!
There is nothing subtle about another steel and glass monstrosity which litters modern architecture.
Instead of looking like a place of worship it will look like a fusion of a high rise condo and a nightclub.
Why can we rebuild it the way it was (as much as possible) and make the fire (and therefore ourselves) an asterisk in the Cathedral’s history? Why must we etch ourselves into everything?
Want a glass cathedral? Go build one. Elsewhere.
Now I’m looking for a dumb phone.
Setun:
just about everything! I read it failed lately because bureaucrats stymied engineer’s creativity to do things the “Western” way (it seems this slowed the Soviet’s bomb since their scientists figures a better way to do something)
How were logic gates defined ? (Ie what type of ternary logic was used)
What were the voltage levels to represent the states?
What were the performance specs?
What did it do well? What did it do poorly?
Can it be re-implemented in CMOS?
- Setun, a ternary (as opposed to binary) computer
- DSSP, a Forth like language that users seem to gush about in the same manner Lispers gush about LISP.
Info/history on both those systems are increadibly difficult to obtain in English!
Anyway it’s complicated. Some in ROC want independence. Some don’t. Some would like to join Beijing (many investors from ROC). Most probably want the whole thing to be on the low and the ROC ignored lest the dragon is awakened.
But regardless what civilians want, being part of China affects the actions of Taipei more than any other issue.
Taiwan is de-jure a part of China. China just happens to be in the curious state of having two competing entities claiming to be the legitimate government.
Both ROC and Beijing agree Taiwan is China. The “C” in ROC is China!
Heck, the breakdown is required information in your federal taxes if you want the depreciation expense.
And for all of us who don’t live in crazy-land CA, we have to get assessed since my purchase price (I.e. market value) ten years ago is meaningless today.
I want it rebuilt as close to the original because we are incapable of self-reflection.
Surely nothing we build can be devoid of ourselves, but why not leave behind subtlety?
The question is obviously rhetorical: Notre Dame is too big, too important an opportunity for some mediocre president and architect to leave their name in posterity.