Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago
> Built by one senior engineer who’s not done mobile apps and a bunch of folks who were very recent code academy graduates.

I would love to hear from one of these folks! I have so many questions.

Comment · 6 years ago
No one has provided evidence of this either. But, if the evidence is presented it still doesn't prove that there is a conflict of interest.
Comment · 6 years ago
Thanks! TIL
Comment · 6 years ago
You're right. I edited it to "implying."
Comment · 6 years ago
You are implying that the app developer, the Buttigieg campaign, former Hillary Clinton staffers, and the DNC are working together in bad faith. Along with the context of the article, you are implying that there is a connection between the aforementioned parties and declining the DHS' offer to test the app.
Comment · 6 years ago
Do you have a source?
Comment · 6 years ago
As far as I know, all of it. The commenter hasn't provided any sources, and I can't find any evidence of a conflict of interest.

As it stands, this is a blatant attempt to discredit the app developer, the Buttigieg campaign, and the DNC.

Comment · 6 years ago
No there isn't. The person running things in Iowa stated to the press that there is no evidence of a security issue, only a technical issue.
Comment · 6 years ago
Yeah, you're right! The Buttigieg campaign should have withheld that 100K until Shadow successfully rigged the Iowa caucus.
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
The paper does not use the phrase “benefits whites.” Interpreting the paper as such is a racist interpretation. You would do well to read the paper.
Comment · 7 years ago
No it does not. I just reread the opening paragraph three times and there is no comparison being made to AA. Did you not read the paper?
Comment · 7 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton