saidnooneever

how would they know im reversing a game if i let it analyse a bunch of decompiled results? aslong as u'd cut out obvious identifiers like perhaps urls / connection info which u dont really need to reverse the game it will be very tedious.

id expect this effort to be either inefficient or yield lots of false positives??

people have varying degrees of sensitivity and also different defaults when it comes to interpreting phrasing depending on their native language, cultural expressions, current emotional state and more.

its a bad thing to assume that everyone is the same here and have some default reactions.

these are people who in name of company are responding to customer concerns, unlike us who are simply commenting on stuff. its a different context to communicate from.

what do you think will be nhe result if they word things clumsily, people get angry, and then stop their subscriptions. Its not a handy thing to be doing. Big tech can be harsh, ive seen people sacked for less.

hey, personally i dont mind either, perhaps its because different words are used to frame things differently in different languages. A lot of people here type english but aren't.

I just said this as some unsolicited advice since out of experience i know it makes. a big difference to choose the right phrasing when speaking to people from around the globe.

I'd suggest stop to use the word 'only' as it can be perceive wrongly here.

you can simply say Cursor users were affected. or exclusively.

just a tip from someone who worked tech support in cyber a long time. choice of words can really help change sentiments in these situations.

'only server xyz was affected' vs. 'server xyz was affected' or 'incident was isolated to server xyz' was often difference between shouting and crying customers or people understanding what was really meant.

he forgets humans also use RAM for other things than inference -_-, his logic is not wrong but hes mismanaged his context window :p

also, its a bit weird to say a supply chain fails if you simply order much more than they have.

in stock:100 'i want a million, the supply chain is failing and others need to stop buying so i can get a million'

accurate

people train all the time fot desert, jungle and arctic warfare, nuclear threats, all sorts of stuff. its 'to be prepared for anything', hoping it never has to be really applied.

if its bannable by a centralized place please explain how it is decentral? i thought that was the kind of controls a decentral system was specifically designed against. is that understanding of mine flawed?

Clearly they don't do security audits of their own code and dependencies using their own product xD

this is just for common designs..you can design much better than common designs if you free your mind from old OS dev thinking if you read all the manuals yourself.

AI wont help u there :-). they will tell u how to build what others already did, which obviously is not good enough

properly implementing things like iommu, amd-vi, svm/hvms and such things more granularly can easily avoid this kind of crap. it costs a lot of processing and performance which is why people skip over it or dont do it.. or maybe they dont read CPU manuals anymore. idk..

its relatively easy to reset caches etc. between contexts. so them it becomes the game of what a context is.

that makes it a truly laughable advices. i imagine things like dhcpd etc. might still also break out to shell? i remember from shellshock that a lot of apps turned out to reach to shell which afaik will be term.

ofc it does matter what they do in there, but would users really need to figure all that out themselves and strace all the things to see whats going on down there? :')

truly poor response. happy i dont use apple.

such an expensive flytrap

cat /dev/random | grep 4

if it doesnt matter just pick any...