ryanchoi
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
https://nicekeyboards.com/nice-nano/
If you’re into low profile switches (that’s a big if!) there are projects the corneish zen https://lowprokb.ca/products/corne-ish-zen
They're like the ones in the Hawaii ban on some otc sunscreens (on oxybenzone and octinoxate) because those two chemicals appear to be particularly bad for coral reefs or something.
Then again, there is ofc the issue of nanoscale particles on your face passing through your own skin, but that sounds like it applies for a lot of modern makeup anyways. And for that, I take it cosmetics R&D people already have something on this...(?)
(*Chemical/physical sunscreens are categorized by their uv protection mechanisms: the former type generally uses organic compounds to absorb uv, the latter type uses inorganic compounds to generally just reflect/scatter, to loosely put it)
I heard/hold a similar take on depression that sounds a little nicer, for better or for worse: it's an issue for which you must seek the answer to on your own, but the problem is that the condition itself takes away your motivation to do anything about it...
https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07772
Articles about:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601848/data-mining-reveal...
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/07/the-s...
In my case it's a longstanding habit from when I was told that GPS could drain battery faster :p (maybe it still? does, I don't know)
I'm the meantime I'll be keeping an eye out for the 3.5" jack in the future, I guess. I do think that it's very convenient to not fiddle with wires, but I like the choice I have now: Preferred shape/sound, vs all the friction associated with wires (sorry ;).
The way I see it, if wireless is here to stay, my situation should only last until someone comes up with a wireless product that I like more than today's lineup. It's just that I prefer my wired setup for the time being!
A reddit thread with some waze voice packs: https://www.reddit.com/r/waze/comments/3pi5yl/waze_voice_pac...
In terms of more foundational things I tried to brush up on linear algebra. Lacking a formal/rigorous college course experience in linalg, I used LAFF from edX before MIT OCW/Prof. Strang's online lectures. I liked both. LAFF was pretty easy/fun, but ymmv, I knew matlab and python (you may see one or the other depending on what year archive you look at) and my undergrad was in a computer-unrelated engineering field (whose math curriculum focused far more on diffEQs which is why I never got deep into linalg much before)
Next year for fundamentals, I'll try to get a better base of statistics and probability. I'm quite weak in the latter.
Level ranges for the 10 questions (the score ranges are in the html): Beginner 0~3, Intermediate 4~7, Advanced 8~10
Makes sense. But:
- You get 0 points if you press A/B, 1 point if you press C, 2 points if you press D
- Scoring uses a fallback to Beginner level if your total score exceeds the expected max which is 10
`const t = Object.values(r).find(a => l >= a.min && l <= a.max) ?? r.beginner`
Pressed D 5x then A 5x, got Advanced