rxm
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
Providing “contrast” is something I appreciate as a reader. It is much easier to provide in person, on a whiteboard. Maybe we need papers to have references to YouTube derivations :)
[0]: Hardy, Pomeau, & Pazzis (1973) JMP: 10.1063/1.1666248
[1]: Frisch, Hasslacher, & Pomeau (1986) PRL: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1505
The sporadic stuff adds up. This is the "other stuff" one needs to do to keep the machines running. It includes the time it took someone to swap a failing drive, or the loss of productivity when the system went down (because of faulty air conditioning maintenance procedure), or the costs of procuring hardware, or dealing with the network provider, and so on. This stuff adds up. We ran a tight ship. Every minute someone spent dealing with the racks of computers was a minute they did not spend creating a product for our customers.
The only thing we had some difficulty with was intermediate reliability storage, at the level of non-raided spinning disks. But that was then, when the offerings where thinner.
Shared a viral amateur video? I understood that this law would allow a troll firm to contact the video creator and offer to sue you and all those that did so.
It’s not the organizations fault. Discovering and maintaining a known sampling for the data is part of the process. I consider it a win when I can get a team to accept that the data process will need to be debugged just like code.
What I fear may go away is the long form books offer. When exploring a new topic, articles are often too dense. In books, authors can establish the background, help create a shared vocabulary, and motivate what is often so condensed in a research article.