rswail
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
There's really no reason not to.
Unlike the "pure" AI players, who rely on NVIDIA and others, Apple is relying on its own capabilities, vertically organized, to maintain its lead in consumer space.
They are using the "cloud" to again, vertically integrated, to preserve their "privacy first" consumer marketing, their hardware to maintain their "premium product" lead, and they are usually second to a market after a first-mover advantage has been reduced by ongoing development.
They make and sell the hardware that will actually make AI something everyone can used without needing to rely on OpenAI/Anthropic et al.
Apple has never had a moat, anyone else could have built this sort of hardware but they haven't.
So they don't care which model wins, because it will always move out to the edge of the network, and they own a large chunk of that edge.
Took at least 5 minutes to set it up and add the apps, then I forgot about it until now.
Just went and removed some apps that I used but don't anymore.
What on earth does that mean and how is it relevant? Are you trying to say that there is no more "[P]rogress of Science and useful Arts" left to be made?
One of the founders of our industry.
I misread.
Thanks for the correction.
Really good politicians work with their speechwriters to get across exactly what they want to communicate.
The purpose is to provide an incentive to creators to reveal their inventions and make them available to the public and other creators, instead of keeping them as trade secrets.
AS: American Samoa
GH: Greenland
SL: Sierra Leone
Started professional work in 1984 on IBM PCs, been through the IT industry ups and downs and developments since. Now I "architect" and spend most of my time drawing pics "with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one".
Interested in the intersection of IT and law; politics and social change; general geek/nerd interests.