rodlette
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
My position is that early SRE solved the hard parts, before I was involved. Services and platforms became reliable. The field is mature. SREs still point to risks, but execs have called their bluff.
The takeaway is to make sure you are actually creating value. Maybe Twitter's SREs were not actually improving reliability much.
SREs predicated Twitter would crumble when Twitter's SRE team was laid off. It had some hiccups, but seems stable now.
I suppose the next line of defence is that it takes a while for architecture to crumble.
Time will tell whether that's accurate, or a No True Scotsman.
I'd like other traits too.
Is this just basically willpower?
Or perhaps I should read the book to find out.
The article and topic aren't overtly political, no need to make it.
> Of course he would say that. He's a senator.
> Of course [they] would say that. [They're Tory leaning].
It needs to be web based and work on desktop/mobile.
Any better alternatives I should be considering?
> the billionaires behind the steering wheel have mistaken cautionary tales and entertainments for a road map, and we’re trapped in the passenger seat. Let’s hope there isn’t a cliff in front of us.
I think the (well esteemed) author is overestimating the marginal impact of science fiction, and has mistaken correlation for causation.
Humans expanding their habitats is just plain old humanity doing its thing.
I also have no interest in crytocurrency.
2000s: web scalability was an emerging field.
2010s: web scalability was a maturing field.
Scalability feels mature now. Maybe we'll see shifts: CRDTs, global SQL DBs?
Growth/investment seems to be in AI.
Sounds like this bug: "Unable to reliably distinguish IPv4-mapped-IPv6 addresses from regular IPv4 addresses" https://github.com/golang/go/issues/37921 .
Use https://pkg.go.dev/net/netip instead.