rodion_89
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
I don't rule it out. Gates managed to pull it off when I didn't think it was possible
> failed to produce any viable alternative to Google
These two statements seem to be in conflict
Substack lets writers start their own subscription publication - think paid blog/newsletter - where writers' and readers' incentives are aligned.
Over 50k people pay to subscribe to publications, and top writers are making six figures.
We use Node, Express, and Postgres on top of Heroku. React for frontend. Simple & effective so we can focus on solving problems for users.
We are 4 people. We raised a series A from a16z this summer and are thoughtfully building our early team. Two of our three founders are technical (the other is a writer) and we're looking for folks to work along side us, shipping things that touch thousands of writers and millions of readers.
Come join us! https://careers.substack.com
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Taibbi
[2] https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/12/the-destructi...
1.3bn non-China Android users = 1.4bn Android users - 0.386bn China Android users [1]
1.28 searches/user/day = 50bn searches / (1.3bn users * 30 days)
That 1.28 for mobile is pretty close to the 1.23 quoted for desktop[1] https://www.techinasia.com/china-386-million-active-android-...
This is an explicit agreement between the customer and content provider. YouTube, Google search, etc don't have any explicit agreement with users in this regard -- the ads just show up.
The TOS says it, your understanding of their business model conveys it, but at the end of the day they just shove the ads in there without directly claiming to their customers, "you must see ads and be tracked to get free content".
I think usage would change dramatically if they actually claimed this when a user first uses their service.