Recent submissions

Comment · 27 days ago
I started knowing about them about 9-10 years ago on youtube. I think it was when they were planning to cross the Pacific Ocean. This was one of the videos I watched https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ9Fqcy7cp0

And then afterwards they resurfaced on my feeds maybe last year, and I got to read the book. I really enjoyed it as well. The episode where you realise the voyage is dangerous and you could lose your life really resonated with me. In my entourage, I think people who have never sailed sometimes under-estimate the dangers and complexity of traveling across a vast ocean ...

Comment · 1 month ago
I had the same experience. I think the only thing that LFS would add to that experience would be the package-manager-less experience (building without portage's help)
Comment · 3 months ago
Thanks for making this, I searched up economics and found at least 3 titles that , when reading through first pages, are really really interesting.
Comment · 4 months ago
You're mis-representing things here.

As in my reply further below, Q1 2026 you can see Google makes 70% of revenue from Ads, the non-ad money you refer to is only 1/3. But if you look at net income, 85% of the net income from Google comes from Services (including Ads).

The Airlines story is taken out of context and different from Google, Delta for example in the Q1 2026 filing you can see they have a revenue of $15.8bn, of which ticket sales is $10.7bn ! Loyalty program income is just $1bn. However the net income supports the story The Atlantic ran, which just means that out of the $1bn, they are getting more net income from their mileage programs, than income from out of $10.7bn ticket sales, because the operating expense of flying airplane is quite high from fuel, etc.

So on one side, Google has 70% revenue from Ads, and even more % if you count net income. On the other side, Airlines - like Delta - have 70% of their revenue from passenger, but relatively speaking less net income from ticket sales if you consider net income.

You are not comparing the same thing. If you just compare revenue, Airlines cannot be called Banks because they still make 70% of their revenue from passenger ticket sales, just as how Google is an Ad company because their main revenue is 70% ads!

If you compare net income, the airlines story can have an angle, but the Google story doesn't, because their net income from Ads is way higher!

Comment · 4 months ago
Where did you get the $120bn figure?

FYI last fiscal results from Q1 of Alphabet, Google Cloud made $20bn revenue Q1 2026, up from Q4 2025 of $17bn. It's a bit misleading to include "subscriptions, platforms, and devices" in cloud.

Q1 2026 Google's revenue totalled $109bn, of which $77bn is Ads, so 70% of its revenue is Ads. It's common knowledge that Google is an Ads company.

Comment · 7 months ago
I think Naval is right when he was making the observation that history has alternated by being determined by either individuals (think Genghis Khan, Napoleon) or larger forces at play (think socio-economic reasoning to many historical events). In this, I would say Trump is Trump (the individual) making his moves that very much go against the larger forces at play that was "business as usual". So equating him to a symptom of America is true in the sense that sooner or later America was bound to have someone like him deviate the course of history, and I also believe post-Trump America is not going to reverse course.
Comment · 7 months ago
Comment · 1 year ago
If you have some time, could you write a short post about your process to make the thousand-credits outcome ? It sounds awesome and I want to learn
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Telegram actually handles this well (better than some other similar chat apps like LINE, Viber, ...)

It has an option inside Security and Privacy, in the subsection on "Calls", where you can limit who can contact you using P2P calls and who will have the call routed through a central server of Telegram.

So usually you can restrict P2P only to your contacts for example, and everyone else will have calls routed to Telegram central server (or just disable calling altogether for everyone else)

Comment · 4 years ago
Using google maps to spot out a non-touristy area was ingenious.

I live near the spot you showed in the example that you picked.

I would suggest next time trying out another method, not based on restaurants, but on using Historical Map: look at the city and go back 100 years, then look at the city in the present, and either choose a place that has not changed at all, or a place that was a slum and now is housing.

Comment · 4 years ago
I remember this being done back when Opera 7 was used. I think it had a feature for mobile OS, where it would route requests to Opera's servers and serve clients a minified, smaller version of the page, so people on 2G at the time could still use the web. I don't remember people being outraged at the time at the prospect of a browser having a baked-in VPN option though.
Comment · 4 years ago
Guessing "ur" in sur means Usage Rights, and M means Modification, C means Commercial, F means Free (to reuse)?
Comment · 4 years ago
If it took you a lot of time to notice it like I did: <spoiler> it's the paragraph justification

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton