rmgraham
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
There are definitely ways to do it without those problems, though. They just wouldn't be quite as simple as the approach done for supporting zip.
* (any source available OS)
I find it interesting that what git calls a commit is actually a revision (or checkpoint, snapshot, point-in-time) and what mercurial calls a revision is actually a commit (or patch, delta, changeset).
I think a lot of people think in terms of patches/changesets and I suspect (still haven't gotten far enough to confirm) hg is a toolbox for managing them in a similar way to how git is a toolbox for manipulating its snapshot based DAG.
Without using either flag rebase should update the commit date and preserve the author date.
If by rebase you meant GitHub's rebase merge option I think you're out of luck :-/
The same scenarios would lead to resource exhaustion if the thread pool wasn't bounded.
I can definitely imagine blocking happening while waiting for a worker to be available, though. Did you mean simply blocking instead of deadlock?
ISO-8601 only really applies to the Gregorian calendar.
I also like how it combines a "big data" format (parquet) with the main "your data isn't actually big data" tool of choice (sqlite).
A decade late for me, but still looks cool.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rmg; my proof: https://keybase.io/rmg/sigs/pWw62UMFkJ8JZWzVJt9Sy8UAmLFxrg0YfbjfVCiJxLA ]