righttoolforjob

If we assume the hypothesis that the current officials are russian plants, then since F.B.I already is being taken over and diverting resources away from foreign threats then this action can be either made to A) make it appear as if control is still in the interest of the US or B) avoiding additional paper trails regarding the importance of jobs/functions, since those are anyway being reshaped.

Framing it as a power struggle seems really shallow.

Scrum is moronic and has proven itself worse and worse over the past 20 years. It started out with good intent but today it is either merely not-in-the-way or horribly dysfunctional. There is a small, small percentage of projects where it might be suitable. It's very small though.

Perhaps? But unless I'd report directly to Elon, I might not want to work in his organizations. Amazon is clearly a whack place for many and there is no shortage of horrible stories from Elon's companies. Elon is clearly a kid who got rich early in life through luck and then sort of stayed a kid, with lots of money and power.

simple: there is no such set.

I think you meant "separate".

What do you mean? That's the entire point of talking about things.

Well, take a car as an example.

The question is not what you use a car for, but rather how the car is built.

I've used it for about 25 years and still love it. Wish you would port it to Windows as well!

They're likely irrelevant anyway. We're all shouting into the void.

This is nothing like a nuclear bomb. A nuclear bomb doesn't choose to explode itself, nor can it replicate itself.

That's besides the point. The argument still holds. We don't want to find ourselves with our foot on an exploding mine before we stop walking across the minefield. At that point it is too late.

What is the limit of intelligence? What limits the human intelligence? How many more times intelligent would an AGI have to be to have the capacity to take over the world?

Nobody says that it necessarily follows, but it's a quite trivial step once you have the AGI, hence pointless that you bring up it as an argument.

Who said it followed? That's a strawman. To dumb it down even further for you, I guess...

There are brains, therefore there can be created an artificial super-brain. Artificial super-brain might have goals which don't align with human brain and we will have no way to understand or control the situation.

Two unrelated facts, which together mean that we should be careful with experimenting with the science working towards super-brains. Just a single super-brain could end us.

Nothing hand-wavy about it. The article that this thread is based on provides the evidence, and you are refuting it. I am refuting your refutation. My experience aligns exactly with the article, that nothing really got better, and especially not the light in my rooms.