richardfey

Yes; or something which has a similar effect.

It feels lke they replace older models with "optimised" versions which are cheaper to run, but keep the same name.

For pixel owners: the Google photos app cannot be uninstalled, but you can disable it using adb.

> "Instead of improving an agent against a fixed test, we let the evaluation evolve alongside the agent"

This quote should have been highlighted earlier in the article.

It defines and introduces a lot of concepts/acronyms in the thinking blocks which we normally don't read.

> If the model was designed specifically to quantize down to 1.58b, then it's different.

> AFAIK, there's no large models designed for this yet.

Isn't BitNet b1.58 2B4T what you are looking for? (haven't tried it myself though)

> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? is a question that is roughly 2000 years old. Still no good answer.

I feel like we are moving towards a very specific answer, without much thought: AI.

Did anyone calculate this for OpenAI?

Looking forward to giving this a try with llama.cpp. I’m watching the open-weights competition with high expectations.

I think that would spoil a lot of the fun. I would favour visual and audio feedback loops to interactively learn how things work under the hood.

Sounds like a great way to inflate your success metrics for AI queries

I disagree. Whether something is manipulation depends on whether you are trying to change someone’s opinion or behavior, not on whether the manipulator has “good” or “bad” intentions, since those judgments are not objectively universal.

> Part of this can be good (you talk about what they care about, where 90% of broadcast messaging might not apply) and part of it can be bad (manipulation.)

Side note: it's manipulation either ways because you chose what to talk about, with a goal in mind.