rhizome

> Selling out to private equity is not a prerequisite to enshittification.

True, simple MBAs often reach the same conclusions.

The cost of that experience/juice was their privacy. Value isn't free.

If you take on a new Facebook experience by using their camera glasses, that will also have a privacy cost that this time will include my (and everyone else in-frame's) privacy.

Audacity isn't trying to be "a proper DAW," it's OK to be just be an audio editor.

Out of curiosity, what EU laws does your 'same product' break?

Humans have imagination, AI doesn't.

Because everybody is playing the same game?

Those are tangible items. Here, the baker is buying shoes from someone who says they're going to be a cobbler some day.

This isn't court. The evidence, such as it is, is all of the smoke which commonly motivates people to look for fire. The strongest and most comprehensive that I've seen is the argument that if Trump was not implicated in the Epstein files, he would be publishing them in free book form himself and forcing every media outlet to advertise it. Slight exaggeration, but I think truly only slight.

Not really relevant to the thread, but there are simple answers to the "eViDeNcE??" question. You may have already known this.

Pulling out randomly, I see it all the time. I beat the computer by a) anticipating; and b) assuming other drivers are idiots who don't see me. I don't have to calculate trajectories and whatnot, people aren't computers, and they can do some things better than a computer can, especially a solely-reactive one.

Google only hires the best of the best.

If the CEO isn't juicing market cap 110% of the time, the board will prosecute them and they will go to JAIL!

"What it does" is a thing that can be changed.

You are correct, sir!

v0.46.4_p3

Greater Fool Theory