rgj
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
By putting UGC on the same TLD you also put your own security at risk, so they basically did you a favor…
He needs to fix it - if he wants his license to enforce being paid for commercial use.
Which shows the problem with this specific license in a single sentence.
Let's say I have an open source project under the GPLv3 which only contains a foo.txt.
"If you are creating an open source application under a license compatible with the GNU GPL license v3, you may use BrowserBox Pro under the terms of the GPLv3."
So I can merge the BrowserBox Pro under GPLv3 to become part of my project.
Now I remove the foo.txt and my project will be a BrowserBox Pro clone under GPLv3 without the commercial restriction.
To my despair, the exam turned out to consist of only a single question.
Question: write code to approach a sphere using triangular planes so the model can be used in rendering a scene.
I didn’t get to that specific chapter, so I had no idea.
My answer consisted of a single sentence:
I won’t do that, this is useless, let’s just use the sphere, it’s way more efficient and more detailed.
And I turned it in.
I got an A+.
"We took our website down this morning when the "PoC"s were released, only serving a static website. Our customers were not pleased. Then we got contacted by Chainguard affiliates using our public support form if we would like to schedule a meeting with them, so that they could sell us their security services."