redrblackr

Any plans on becoming an independent CA? Would certificates issued in your name also risk being affected by US sanctions trough sentigo?

People are really sleeping on nc memories, does all the good things but none of the "I decide how your images are stored and nothing else should touch them" that immich does.

When I checked half a year ago memories (with the nc ecosystem) was still ahead in terms of features (gallery specific), albeit object tagging is rather crap in nc (faces better)

No, thats between 0.06 and 0.12 frame latency on 60fps. It's not even a frame on 144Hz (1s/144≈7ms)

Or just use ipv6!

You could also upload directly to the filesystem and then run occ files:scan, or if the storage is mounted as external it just works.

Another method is to set your machines /etc/hosts (or equivalent) to the local IP of the instance (if the device is only on lan you can keep it, otherwise remove it after the large transfer).

Now your rounter should not send traffic to itself away, just loop it internally so it never has to go over your isps connection - so running over lan only helps if your switch is faster than your router..

Two things:

1. Did you open back port request with these basic patches? If you have orders of magnitude speed improvements it would be aswesome to share!

2. You definitively don't need an entire sysadmin team to run nextcloud, in my work (large organisation) there's three instances running (for different parts/purposes of which only one is run by more than one person, and I run myself both my personal instance and for a nonprofit with ~100 persons, it's really not much work after setup (and other systems are plenty of a lot more complicated systems to set up, trust me)

There is also "memories for nextcloud" which basically matches immich in feature set (was ahead until last month), nextcloud+memories make a very strong replacement for gdrive or dropbox

Could you expand on what restrictions they have placed on the community version?

I use my yubikey on both my android and linux (tumbleweed) with exclusively firefox, I have not found something that does not work.. Maybe you mean non-hardware passkeys built into the os? But one could just use keepassxc or like bitwarden, those work in Firefox and Linux as well

Clarify what you see there that makes it below any expectations?

I was surprised by the amount of dislike of passkeys in this thread until I realised I had misunderstood what passkeys refer to.

I thought it was the same as security keys, which are like digital, but still physical, keys. They are awesome, one just has to have two and you are set. Passkeys tied to a cloud service or device like a smartphone are a terrible alternative (comparatively), from privacy and security (as in not get locked out) standpoints. At least they use fido2 so pushing for passkeys add support for security keys at the same time..

EDIT: I assumed passkeys refer exclusively to hardware passkeys, mb. My answer below means separate HARDWARE "security keys", not ones tied to a smartphone, Google or Microsoft account...

The problem here is that you are assuming one passkey. Just like you don't get just one key for your door its risky to get only one passkey, if you are planning to use it exclusively.

Passkeys are like normal keys but for your digital life. They have many benefits over normal keys like being impossible to copy/pick while still being easy to replace (as long as you have one that works) and if used properly (with a short pin-code) someone who finds or steal your key cant log in to your virtual doors anyway. They compare even better to passwords.

Just get one for your keychain and one to put at your stationary computer at home. The only thing to remember is to add both to your account(s), which still is faster than fiddling with your password manager and/or second factors.

Passkeys are really amazing, the only thing(s) remaining is to stop confusing people with terminology, explain that you should have a pair and for services to start properly using the keys as a combined first+second factor with a pin (which you can have safely the same on all your passkeys, in contrast to passwords).

What do you mean not cross-vendor transferable? You can use any brand key that properly implements the protocol (fido2/webaunth), and replace them with any brand key. If you mean copy them, well yea that's kinda the point..

There are plenty of ways for recovery on reasonable services, sometimes they ask to set up way to many (and with multiple passkeys, recovery is only relevant if you loose ALL of your keys).

Just want to point out that if your missus had a pair of passkeys there would not have been any issue!