realxrobau
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
She's seen her Dr and swabs are being processed. She's on antivirals and painkillers and has a nasty fever.
Now I am horrified about how awful it can be, after reading all the comments in here.
The reason the case was dismissed was because the requirement was removed.
The case was reopened on appeal due to the rules being temporarily re-established.
Anything else is nonsense. This is spelled out in the article but wrapped with a bunch of whatifs and maybes and possiblies.
If your hypothesis was correct, then NOTHING is a vaccine.
The latest post to the list, as of this post, is supporting the anti-ecdhe side, with the reasoning being that there is no code written for ecdhe, which is obviously stretching the truth beyond reasonable doubt.
Assuming the requirements are actually justified, this seems like a tolerable compromise.
The three different issues are a username called "-2", incorrectly parsing/validating certificates, and tftp paths.
There's also a dhcpd issue that was just fixed in a new release