re
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
Can you cite specifically what in the linked article or discussion leads you to say that?
Can you put the pre-LLM version of your post on your site somewhere? I (and presumably many others) would be much more interested in reading that, even if the English is a bit awkward.
I notice that a lot of scam texts use domains that start with a TLD followed by a hyphen, like:
https://wa.gov-phish.fit/dol
https://seattle.gov-phish.cc/dmv
(Real examples, with "phish" replacing a string of 3-4 random letters)In some ways, it's a more convincing fake URL, since even if you're used to reading the domain right-to-left, your brain wants to start from the hyphen since it's a different character following a familiar TLD. But that type of domain also seems a lot easier for spam detection rules to catch.
All that being said, I think it's a neat idea and a cool tool!
The "TRAINING" visualization does seem synthetic though, the graph is a bit too "perfect" and it's odd that the generated names don't update for every step.
Indeed, the whole "Ironically, switching from Apache 2.0 to AGPL irrevocably makes the project forkable" section seems misguided. Apache 2.0-licensed software is just as forkable.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/could-couldnt-care-l...
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/could-ca...
I don't think it counts as recreating a project "from scratch" if the model that you're using was trained against it. Claude Opus 4.5 is aware of the stable-diffusion.cpp project and can answer some questions about it and its code-base (with mixed accuracy) with web search turned off.