Recent submissions

Comment · 4 months ago
[flagged]
Comment · 5 months ago
> Recently someone messaged me on Reddit about my post. I replied. They wrote again, I replied again. After a few messages I realized I was talking to an AI agent.

My exact experience. The irony was that we were talking about AI agents

Comment · 6 months ago
The Tools detail page is wrong, it's the one from last release, November 2025.
Comment · 6 months ago
almost fell for it
Comment · 6 months ago
I can't seem to change the colors of the pie chart, other than the predefined themes. But all of those are horrible for a pie chart.
Comment · 6 months ago
> This bug is categorically distinct from hallucinations or missing permission boundaries

I was expecting some kind of explanation for this

Comment · 6 months ago
Sure, two 3060 can pull usable performance on an usable LLM, but a single one can't (yet).

> 3x RTX 3060 less tgab the price of a 3090

Interesting, here it is around the same. 200-250€ for a used 12GB 3060 and 600-800 for a used 3090€.

Comment · 7 months ago
Was any text in the repo NOT written by AI?
Comment · 7 months ago
14B even at Q4 isn't realistic for coding on a single 12GB RTX 3060. Token speed is too slow. After all they are dense models. You aren't getting a good MoE model under 30B. You can do OCR, STT, TTS really well and for LLMs, good use cases are classification, summarization and extraction with <10B models.
Comment · 7 months ago
> llama.cpp (previously Ollama)

I almost fainted

Comment · 8 months ago
Interesting. Won't stuff like entity extraction suffer? Especially in multilingual use cases. My worry is that a smaller model might not realize some text is actually a persons name because it is very unusual.
Comment · 8 months ago
Is it possible for such a small model to outperform gemini 3 or is this a case of benchmarks not showing the reality? I would love to be hopeful, but so far an open source model was never better than a closed one even when benchmarks were showing that.
Comment · 9 months ago
This is very interesting. Especially the last part where it shows gpt-5.2 and gpt-oss and their very similar and unique outcome of being 90%+ Serious.

I tested this locally and got the same result with gpt-oss 120b. But only on the default 'medium' reasoning effort. When I used 'low' I kept getting more playful responses with emojis and when I used 'high' I kept getting more guessing responses.

I had a lot of fun with this and it provided me with more insight than I would have thought.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton