ramblerman
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
Imo the vast majority of companies would be better with a lot less engineers. For the simple fact that they are not setup for producing that much work.
They need time to discuss, decide what they even want to accomplish, just letting your POs throw more features at all your products on a whim is hugely detrimental.
You could just say you don't like the excessive use of caps.
Not a very rigorous economic argument - besides they also don't share an immigration policy, nor a single currency (Denmark)
It's clear of Fermat's last theorem. But I figured that the Millennium Prize Problems (of which there are only 10) would have some real spillover into either physics or chemistry.
Yet when one of them gets solved, it seems to be that the argument is, "yeah but not like that".
Imagine if an AI solved cancer, or a vastly cheaper way to get into space, we wouldn't react like that.
"responsibility table tennis" would be a better fit.
Competence in english translates to the skill side of the word
If a year from now we have a model that is 2-5x of Fable/Astra that is definitely world changing.
That's still a pretty big marker of competence in my eyes.
The point of controversy seems to be who gets credit
Then follow people that don’t post bait?